Legal Opinion

Molacek v. White

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 12, 1912No. 2721PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from District Court, Murray County; Albert Rennie, Special Judge. Action in mandamus by J. B. White and others against T. E. Molaeek and others as the Board of Education of the City of Sulphur. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

This case presents error from the district court of Murray county, and is an action in mandamus, brought by the defendants in error, as plaintiffs, who allege that they are ■electors and resident citizens, taxpayers, and property owners, having children of school age and living within the city of Sul-phur, and that the defendants, who appear in this court as plaintiffs in error, constitute the board of education in and for the said city. The purpose of the action is to secure a writ of mandamus, commanding defendants to acquire title to a certain block of land in the city of Sulphur and to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. NalleTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Norris v. Cross, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Gale v. Village of KalamazooMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Edwards v. Goldsboro.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. McCortle v. BatesOhio Supreme Court · 1876

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dunham v. ArderySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Lovett, Creek County Com'rs v. LankfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. State Ex Rel. School District No. 29 v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  4. State Ex Rel. Collins v. ParksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. State Highway Commission v. Green-Boots Const. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API