Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Wasserman
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 19, 1957No. Civ. 22006PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DRAPEAU, J. pro tem. *
This is a similar case to Gordon v. Landau, ( † Cal.App.) [314 P.2d 757], decided this day, and to Gordon v. Schwartz, 147 Cal.App.2d 213 [305 P.2d 117].
There is no need to repeat in this opinion the facts as to plaintiffs’ business, and their relations with their customers and employees. These may be read in the Schwartz and Landau cases.
Suffice it to say here that Robert S. Wasserman, defendant in this case, was also a collector-salesman for plaintiffs; that he quit their employ, went into the same business, and then used plaintiffs’ lists to solicit customers for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Aetna Building Maintenance Co. v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- King v. GeroldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Gordon v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Handyspot Co. v. BuegeleisenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hollingsworth Solderless Terminal Co., a Corporation v. William Turley, an Individual and Hoffman Electronics Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Don Ray Smith v. Cmta-Iam Pension TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Travelers Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Gordon v. LandauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- The Retirement Group v. GalanteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.