Travelers Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.
Applicant Coakley, a California resident, having been injured while working in Utah for Core Labora t-ory,- -Incorporated, has applied for benefits under the California • workmen’s compensation statute. The referee found that the parties entered into a contract of employment in California, but rescinded it and agreed to a new one when applicant reported to the jobsite in Wyoming. Upon reconsideration. the board found that the contract under which applicant wás working at the time of injury had been formed in 'California. Accordingly, the board held applicant to be entitled to benefits under…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Emery v. EmeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Grant v. McAuliffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Rubin v. Irving Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Aaron Senne v. Kansas City Royals BaseballCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Kasel v. Remington Arms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- People v. ToomeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Arno v. Club Med Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.