Legal Opinion

Handyspot Co. v. Buegeleisen

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 19, 1954No. Civ. 8414PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARNS, J. pro tem. *

This is an appeal from an order granting a preliminary injunction, and enjoining appellant from soliciting the trade of those of its former customers whose accounts had been transferred to respondent pursuant to a written agreement between the parties.

Prior to November 13, 1950, appellant had an established business which consisted of selling various drugs, sundries, and novelty items to certain retail establishments in the counties of Mendocino and Sonoma. Appellant regularly serviced the stores to whom it sold such goods, and, as needed, replenished the stock which was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Grace Bros. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  2. Barber v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. George v. BurdusisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Mahlstedt v. FugitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. County of Tehama v. SissonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Russell v. Jim Russell Supply, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  2. Gordon v. LandauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Department of Mental Hygiene v. McGilveryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Earthworks, Inc. v. SehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Tatum v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API