Legal Opinion

King v. Gerold

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 1952No. Civ. 18687PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Respondent is the inventor and designer of a house trailer known as the “Sport King.” On September 27, 1946, by a writing he licensed appellant to manufacture and sell such trailer for a period of six months—expiring March 16, 1947. It was agreed that (1) respondent should receive a royalty of $50 for each trailer sold at wholesale and $100 for each sold at retail; (2) if the license be not renewed after the initial six months’ period appellant “shall cease to produce said trailer for any purpose whatsoever.” The contract was drawn by appellant’s attorney. It was their mutual intention by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Steelduct Co. v. Henger-Seltzer Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Gardner v. ShreveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Summerhays v. ScheuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLPCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Painton & Company, Ltd., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Bourns, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  3. Surgidev Corp. v. Eye Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
  4. Gordon v. LandauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. The Retirement Group v. GalanteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API