Legal Opinion

Winkle v. City of Tucson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1997No. CV-97-0374-APPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order enjoining the City of Tucson and its Clerk from placing an initiative on the November 1997 ballot. We review the trial court’s ruling pursuant to our appellate jurisdiction under A.R.S. § 19-122(C). On September 13, 1997, after considering the submitted briefs, we vacated the trial court’s order and advised the Clerk that the initiative could be placed on the general election ballot. We further indicated that this opinion would follow.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Signed on April 4, 1997, A.R.S. § 23-362 declared minimum wage a matter of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Adams v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Tilson v. MoffordArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Clayton v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State ex rel. Bullard v. OsbornArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  5. City of Scottsdale v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1968

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Herbst Gaming, Inc. v. Sec'y of StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Karen Fann v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Stewart v. Advanced Gaming Technologies, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Town of Gilbert v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  5. Berent v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 2007

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API