Legal Opinion

Luther Construction Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 14, 2003No. 1 CA-TX 02-0018PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIMMER, Judge.

¶ 1 In Valencia Energy Co. v. Arizona Dep’t of Revenue, 191 Ariz. 565, 576, 578-79, ¶¶ 34, 41, 959 P.2d 1256, 1267, 1269-70 (1998), our supreme court held that in rare situations, the Arizona Department of Revenue (“ADOR”) can be equitably estopped from assessing a tax that is legally owed by a taxpayer. We decide in this appeal whether the tax court correctly ruled as a matter of law that Luther Construction Co., Inc. cannot demonstrate such a rare situation, and summary judgment upholding ADOR’s assessment of delinquent tax against Luther is therefore appropriate.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Cotton Petroleum Corp. v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Ramah Navajo School Bd., Inc. v. Bureau of Revenue of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Duhame v. State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Western Corrections Group, Inc. v. TierneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. Lowe v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. Lowe v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. Maricopa v. RanaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  5. Ute Mountain v. AdorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API