Legal Opinion
Gorman v. Pima County
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 4, 2012No. 2 CA-CV 2012-0037PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VÁSQUEZ, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 James and Jean Gorman and the Brad P. Gorman Memorial Fund (collectively, the Gormans) appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing their breach of contract and estoppel claims against Pima County (the County). The Gor-mans contend the court erred as a matter of law in concluding no contract existed between them and the County. They also argue that even if there was no contract, the court erred by not finding the County “should nonetheless be estopped from denying its liability to [them].” For the reasons stated below, we affirm in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Valencia Energy Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Trollope v. KoernerArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- City of Phoenix v. YatesArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Tiffany Incorporated v. WMK Transit Mix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brent Quade v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Santorii v. MartinezRusso, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Donges v. USAA Fed. Sav. BankDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
- State ex rel. Darwin v. ArnettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Cohen v. Lovitt & Touche, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.