Legal Opinion
Kempf v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided September 17, 1984No. Docket 75060PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. B. Sullivan, J.
The subject of this dispute is whether claimant is entitled to unemployment compensation. Respondent has appealed from the circuit court’s order granting plaintiff unemployment compensation and reversing the Michigan Employment Security Commission’s determination. The facts of this case are undisputed and a legal question involving statutory interpretation is presented.
Claimant, Maureen Kempf, became employed by respondent, Michigan Bell Telephone Company, in February of 1968. Due to some health problems claimant was given a medical leave of absence from December 21, 1979, until December 25,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Melia v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- General Motors Corp. v. ErvesMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Scholten v. RhoadesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Kizer v Livingston County Board of CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- Auten v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Haywood v. FowlerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- Harris v. Pennsylvania Erection & ConstructionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Dow Chemical Co. v. CurtisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Key State Bank v. AdamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Wiersma v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.