Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Kizer v Livingston County Board of Commissioners

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 1972No. Docket 13423PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

On December 28, 1970, the Attorney General addressed the following letter opinion to the Prosecuting Attorney of Clinton County:

“You have requested my opinion as to whether reapportioning the county board of commissioners as required by Act 261, PA 1966 [MCLA 46.401 et seq; MSA 5.359(1) et seq\, the board of commissioners in counties the population of which on the effective date of Act 261 was less than 75,000 is authorized during a period of 30 days following the publication of the latest official United States decennial census figures of the 1970 federal decennial census to adopt a plan for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Avery v. Midland CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. GoldenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. City of Lansing v. Township of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Van Antwerp v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Weems v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Bell v. F. J. Boutell Driveaway Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. PottsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Cronin v. Minster PressMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Indenbaum v. Michigan Board of MedicineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API