Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ulen

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 1992No. 2PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Clive Antony Ulen, a lawyer in the City of Harrisburg, was tried by jury and was found guilty of possession of a controlled substance and criminal attempt to deliver a controlled substance. 1 Following the denial of post-trial motions, Ulen was sentenced to serve concurrent terms of imprisonment for not less than one (1) year nor more than four (4) years on his conviction for attempting to deliver cocaine and for not less than six (6) months nor more than one (1) year on his conviction for possessing cocaine. On direct appeal from the judgment of sentence, Ulen asserts that…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SattazahnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Commonwealth v. ManchasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. State v. BrunsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. UlenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. In the Interest of M.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API