Commonwealth v. Ulen
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
PAPADAKOS, Justice.
We granted review in this case to determine whether wrongfully withheld evidence that enhances the credibility of an otherwise questionable witness prejudices the defense per se, even if the substance of that evidence is only corroborative of testimony given by such a witness, and to consider what the remedy for withholding such evidence should be.
Clive Antony Ulen (Appellant) was convicted in a jury trial of criminal attempt to deliver a controlled substance and unlawful possession of a controlled substance. His conviction was affirmed by the Superior…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MooseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. ThielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. RodgersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CountermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. HanfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- In the Interest of M.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Com. v. Carter, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Com. v. Chapman, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.