Legal Opinion

Bush v. Modern Woodmen of America

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 9, 1915PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal jrom Allamakee District Court. — -W. J. Springer, Judge. Action on a certificate issued by the defendant, The Modern Woodmen of America, to plaintiff. Intervention by nephews of deceased, on the ground that plaintiff was ineligible as dependent.

1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.

1. Insurance: fraternal benefit certificate: designating beneficiary: statutory control. This is a suit • in equity, brought by the plaintiff, upon a .certificate issued bv the defendant Modern Woodmen of America to one W. D. Bean, in which she was named as beneficiary. The interveners are the heirs of W. I). Bean, and they claim the proceeds because of alleged ineligibility of the named beneficiary, the plaintiff.

The society admits liability, but expresses doubt as to the party entitled to the funds, filed an answer to that effect, and paid the money into court after suit was begun, without…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. KnightIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Coverdale v. Royal ArcanumIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Alexander v. ParkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Wist v. Grand Lodge A. O. U. W.Oregon Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Murphy v. NowakIllinois Supreme Court · 1906

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Locomotive Engineers' Mutual Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  2. Gristy v. HudgensArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Weiditschka v. Supreme Tent Knights of Maccabees of the WorldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  4. Richey v. Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the WorldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  5. Bennett v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API