Bennett v. Modern Woodmen of America
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.
The plaintiff had judgment for the amount of a benefit certificate issued by the defendant upon the life of Frank S. Plummer, and the defendant appeals.
The defendant is a fraternal benefit society organized under the laws of the state of Illinois. It has its principal place of business in that state, with subordinate lodges' in various parts of the United States, one of which, known as “San Jose Camp No. 7777 of Modern Woodmen of America,” is located in the city of San Jose, in this state. On the seventeenth day of March, 1900, the defendant issued to Frank S. Plummer, then a member in good…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Steele v. Fraternal TribunesIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Baldwin v. BegleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- Samberg v. Knights of the Modern MaccabeesMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Sovereign Camp of Woodmen of the World v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Case v. Sun InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gifford v. Travelers Protective Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Bernstein v. Alameda-Contra Costa Medical Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- McCormick v. Woodmen of the WorldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Niernberg v. GavinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
- Fernandez v. Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the WorldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.