Legal Opinion

Richey v. Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 27, 1918PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from. Polk District Court. — W. S. Ayres, Judge. The plaintiff bad a recovery as beneficiary of a certificate issued by the defendant, and it appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.

1. Insurance : unreasonable changes in by-laws. I. In March, 1895, tlie defendant issued a benefit certificate to one Harry A. Richey. This certificate was accepted with a provision that the same should be liable to forfeiture if the assured should fail to comply with the “conditions, constitutions, fundamental laws and such by-laws as are or may be adopted” by the insuring society. Some four years after what is claimed to be the disappearance of Richey, the by-laws were made by the society which provide that it shall be a binding condition of the certificate that:

“The absence or…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Supreme Council American Legion of Honor v. PerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  2. Tisdale v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  3. McCarthy v. Supreme Lodge New England Order of ProtectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Covenant Mutual Life Ass'n v. KentnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Jordan v. Iowa Mutual Tornado InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Modern Woodmen of America v. MichelinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Berger v. Amana SocietySupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  3. Haines v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  4. Garrison v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Fordyce v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API