Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Alden v. Hindin

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 31, 2003No. B158050PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COOPER, P. J.

Plaintiff Nick A. Alden appeals from an order terminating his action for malicious prosecution and conspiracy, filed against Mary Jo Stirling and her attorneys, Tina S. Schuchman and her law corporation, and Robert Hindin and Bruce Abel and their firm Hindin & Abel, LLP (collectively H&A). The order sustained without leave to amend the attorney defendants’ demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint, based on failure to comply with the prefiling requirements of Civil Code section 1714.10 (section 1714.10), which apply to certain actions against an attorney for conspiracy with a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Norton v. HinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Pierce v. LymanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barton v. KhanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Cortese v. Sherwood, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Chavez v. Dhaliwal CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Cortese v. SherwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. Klotz v. Milbank,Tweed, Hadley & McCloyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API