Legal Opinion
Barton v. Khan
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 13, 2007No. B190428PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARMSTRONG, J.—
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
Plaintiff and appellant Kenneth Barton, a shareholder of defendant RPost International Limited (RPost) was, until 2004, also an employee, officer and director of the company. Defendants Zafar Khan, Terrance Tomkow and Henri Isenberg (together, the Individual Defendants) were, during the relevant time period, officers and directors of RPost.
Barton’s original complaint alleged three causes of action: intentional and negligent breach of fiduciary duty against the Individual Defendants, and Labor Code violations against RPost. On August 19, 2005,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Loser v. E. R. Bacon Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Alden v. HindinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
3Cited by3 opinions
- People ex rel. Strathmann v. Acacia Research Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Almodovar v. Downey High School CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Jamulians Against the Casino v. Wildlife Conservation Board CA3California Court of Appeal · 2016