Legal Opinion

McFarland v. Commercial Boiler Works, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1941No. 28198PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

Action was instituted to recover damages from defendants on account of injuries suffered by plaintiff when he fell from a grating inside a ship onto steel tanks some twenty feet below.

The amended complaint alleged that defendant Nieder & Marcus, Inc., purchased the engine in the barge “Mazama”; that, to expedite its removal from the ship’s hold, defendant removed certain engine room gratings and a steel stairway; that at the top of the stairway there was located a steel platform or grating; that defendant negligently failed to replace certain bolts supporting and securing the platform; and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Carlisle Packing Co. v. SandangerSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. St. Germain v. Potlatch Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Sweeten v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Thornton v. DowWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Helland v. BridenstineWashington Supreme Court · 1909

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tucker v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Billingsley v. Rovig-Temple Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. James v. BurchettWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Escobedo v. WardOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Seattle Aerie No. 1 of Fraternal Order of Eagles v. Commissioner of Unemployment Compensation & PlacementWashington Supreme Court · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API