Legal Opinion

Thornton v. Dow

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1910No. 8978PublishedCited by 40 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Robert H. Lindsay, Esq., judge pro tempore, entered April 7, 1910, granting a new trial, after a special verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendants, in an action for personal injuries sustained by a spectator through the negligence of a contractor in constructing a public building.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.

This is an action for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff, against the defendants as contractors, who built the present state armory building for the state of Washington, in the city of Seattle. The plaintiff alleged negligence in the construction of a balcony railing, constructed in such a way as to render the same dangerous; that it was dangerous, and that by reason of its frailty the plaintiff and others, while witnessing an athletic meet, were precipitated over the balcony railing and were injured. The defense was, that the building was constructed in accordance with the plans…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  3. Bohan v. Port Jervis Gaslight Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Curtin v. SomersetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  5. Boswell v. LairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Comstock v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Gerkin v. Brown & Sehler Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Strandholm v. General Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Davis v. Baugh Industrial Contractors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Martin v. WilliamsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API