Legal Opinion
Kemet Electronics Corp. v. Barshefsky
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 19, 1997No. Slip Op. No. 97-115. Court No. 97-06-00930PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Judge.
Plaintiffs Kemet Electronics Corp., et al. (collectively, “the Passive Electronics Coalition”), seek a preliminary injunction against defendants, United States Trade Representative Charlene Barshefsky (“USTR”) and Commissioner of Customs George Weise, to enjoin the reduction and eventual elimination of tariffs on capacitors and resistors as part of the Information Technology Agreement (“Agreement”) negotiated by the USTR under the auspices of the World Trade Organization (“WTO”). Plaintiffs contend that the authority to proclaim tariff reductions delegated by Congress to…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- The Humane Society Of The United States v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Nufarm America's, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Gilda Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Humane Society of the United States v. ClintonUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Totes-Isotoner Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.