Legal Opinion
Humane Society of the United States v. Clinton
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 5, 1999No. Slip op. 99-23; Court 98-03-00557PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARZILAY, District Judge.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In 1992 Congress passed the High Seas Driftnet Fisheries Enforcement Act, Pub.L. No. 102-582, 106 stat. 4900 (1992) (the “Driftnet Act”). This Act was one in a series of United States and international enactments with the purpose of reducing the detrimental effects on sea life caused by the use of large-scale driftnets in fisheries around the world. 1
The Driftnet Act required, among other actions, that the Secretary of Commerce publish a list of nations whose nationals or vessels conduct large scale driftnet fishing beyond the exclusive…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Consolidated Bearings Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Ammex, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- The Humane Society Of The United States v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Humane Society of the United States v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.