Legal Opinion
Abo El Ela v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 23, 1991No. C0-90-2509PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
The trial court granted summary judgment to respondent State of Minnesota based on discretionary immunity and on its ruling that appellant’s negligence superseded the state’s negligence as a matter of law. We reverse and remand for trial.
FACTS
On January 24, 1989, at approximately noon, appellant Eid Hassan Abo El Ela was traveling in his automobile on a four-lane northbound section of 1-94 in north Minneapolis. A Minnesota State Patrol speed enforcement aircraft clocked appellant’s vehicle traveling at an unlawful speed and radioed this information to state highway…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Cairl v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Nusbaum v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Holmquist v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Youngblood v. ClepperCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
- Masonick v. J.P. Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Ingram v. SyversonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Lee v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Sayers Ex Rel. Sayers v. Beltrami CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.