Legal Opinion
Lee v. Regents of the University of Minnesota
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 25, 2003No. A03-381PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.
Appellant Jong Lee challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment arguing that (1) the district court was correct in determining the court had jurisdiction to review the Phase III panel decision; (2) the district court erred in determining the Phase III panel decision did not create enforceable contract rights; (3) the Minnesota Uniform Arbitration Act (“UAA”), Minn.Stat. § 572.18 (2002), and the Public Employee Labor Relations Act (“PEL-RA”), Minn.Stat. § 179A.13, subd. 1 (2002), apply to a Phase III panel decision; (4) the district court erred in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Victorija Smith v. St. Louis University, a Missouri Benevolent Corporation Operating as St. Louis University Hospital and School of MedicineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Allen v. Hennepin CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Jung v. City of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
- Allen v. Hennepin CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004