Legal Opinion

Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Mercer

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1995No. 23886PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Respondent Lorraine Mercer (“Mercer”) and her seventeen-year-old daughter, Rhonda, embarked on a road-trip vacation from their home in British Columbia, Canada, through the Western United States. In preparation for the trip, Mercer had her regular mechanic in Canada thoroughly check and service her car. The mechanic inspected the car and advised Mercer that her rear tires were in good condition but that she needed two new front tires. At her request, he replaced the two bad tires.

On the return trip to Canada from Southern California, Mercer, Rhonda, and Rhonda’s boyfriend headed north…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brunzell v. Golden Gate National BankNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Beattie v. ThomasNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Bergmann v. BoyceNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Schwartz v. Estate of GreenspunNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Forman v. Eagle Thrifty Drugs and Markets, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by42 opinions

  1. Dow Chemical Co. v. MahlumNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Yamaha Motor Co., U.S.A. v. ArnoultNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Ringle v. BrutonNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Albios v. Horizon Communities, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Edwards v. DaughertySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API