Legal Opinion

Forman v. Eagle Thrifty Drugs and Markets, Inc.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1973No. 7045PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Zenoff, J.:

This case is before us after protracted litigation in the lower court. The relevant facts are largely of a procedural nature.

Respondent Eagle Thrifty Drugs and Markets, Inc., owns a three and one-half acre parcel situated at the intersection of Mayberry Drive and Hunter Lake Drive in Reno, Nevada. In 1967 Eagle Thrifty sought a change in land use for the entire parcel to C-lb, which is neighborhood shopping center commercial. The land use change was denied by the city planning commission but later granted by the Reno City Council following appeal to that body.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Daniel J. Donovan v. Esso Shipping CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  3. Kelley v. JohnNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Kleiber v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. W. Stanley Jones and Thomas E. Walker, Partners D/B/A Stanley Jones Company v. Chaney & James Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Leonard v. City of BothellWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. We The People Nevada ex rel. Angle v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Albert H. Wohlers & Co. v. BartgisNevada Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Ed Zaagman, Inc. v. City of KentwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Garvin v. Ninth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2002

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API