Legal Opinion
Slovensky v. Friedman
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 19, 2006No. C049442PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
After settling a toxic mold personal injury complaint against an apartment complex, plaintiff Tamara Slovensky filed a tort action against her attorneys, pleading two counts (styled “Cause[s] of Action”). Her first count, for legal malpractice, alleged defendants negligently failed to obtain an adequate recovery. Her second count, for breach of fiduciary duty, alleged defendants misrepresented and concealed material facts in the course of the litigation. As to both counts, she sought damages and “other and further relief.”
Defendants (Morton L. Friedman, C. Brooks Cutter, the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Platt Electrical Supply, Inc. v. Eoff Electrical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Prakashpalan v. Engstrom, Lipscomb & LackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Wallace v. McCubbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Environmental Network Corp. v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Thomson v. CanyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.