Lennane v. Franchise Tax Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAMBDEN, J.
Section 19717 of the Revenue and Taxation Code (unspecified section references are to that code) grants the court in a tax refund action the discretion to award taxpayers their reasonable litigation costs if they prevail and the position of the State of California in the proceeding was “not substantially justified” (subd. (c)(2)(A)(i)). 1 We hold in this refund action against the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) that prevailing parties James P. and Susan K. Lennane (taxpayers) were properly denied litigation costs in appellate litigation because, as the superior court found, FTB’s…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- People v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Producers Dairy Delivery Co. v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Doe v. United States Swimming, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Northwest Energetic Services, LLC v. California Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Gruen v. GruenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Pollak v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.