Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Davey v. Owen
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1937No. 26774PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.
The issues' presented in the habeas corpus proceedings filed in Clark county on behalf of Heimie Ashkenazie must be determined under the provisions of the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act (Am. H. B. No. 108, 117 Ohio Laws, —, Sections 109-1 to 109-32, General Code) which became effective August 20, 1937.
Under that enactment it is specifically provided that, subject to its provisions, the provisions of the Constitution of the United States and all acts of Congress enacted in pursuance thereof shall be controlling in matters pertaining to extradition. Section 109-2, General Code.
The principal…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Roberts v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- United States v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Commonwealth of Ky. v. DENNISON, GOVERNOR, &C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Munsey v. CloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Charlton v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1913
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- State ex rel. Sherrills v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Hansen v. ReedOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Yee v. Erie County Sheriff's DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Crandall, Pheils & Wisniewski v. DeCessnaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- MaldonadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.