Legal Opinion

Huntley v. Smith

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 27, 1922No. 22,927PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Plaintiffs are real estate brokers. Defendant Margaret Smith is the owner of a flat building in the city of Minneapolis and defendant Arthur Smith is her father. As the action was dismissed by plaintiffs as to defendant Arthur Smith, the term defendant, when used hereafter, will designate the defendant Margaret.

Plaintiffs alleged that they had been employed by defendant to find a purchaser for her property; that they were to have as their commission whatever amount they procured for the property over the sum of $40,000; that they found a purchaser for the property for the sum of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Williams v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  2. McDonald v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Rahm v. CummingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Flower v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  5. Cremer v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Greer v. KooikerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Olson v. PenkertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Lake Company v. MolanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Colstad v. LevineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. John E. Massengale, Trustee v. Transitron Electronic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API