Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. State Scholarship Commission v. Magar

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1980No. TC 34033, CA 13780, SC 26559PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action on a promissory note which provided for reasonable attorney fees in the event of a default. The only issue is whether the Court of Appeals was correct in reversing the trial court for denying attorney fees to the plaintiff. 42 Or App 361, 600 P2d 505 (1979).

The complaint alleged that defendant had defaulted in payment of the note and that $700 was a reasonable attorney’s fee. It prayed for a judgment of $1,359 as the principal balance, with interest, and also for attorney fees in the sum of $700. The answer was a general denial, with affirmative defenses.

Prior to trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Colby v. LarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Schmidt v. Oregon Gold Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Nieminen v. PitzerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Westfall v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State ex rel. State Scholarship Commission v. MagarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Carlson v. BlumensteinOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Russell v. SheahanOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Barbara Parmenter Living Trust v. LemonOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State Ex Rel. Adult & Family Services Division v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Bush v. City of Prineville (A165637)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API