Legal Opinion

Routh v. Palm Oil Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 12, 1958No. Civ. 22641PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVallee, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment for defendants in an action for money.

The complaint alleges three separate transactions entered into by defendants with plaintiff: the first, the sale by plaintiff to defendants of an oil lease for which $7,000 was unpaid; the second, the obtaining by plaintiff for defendants of another oil lease for which defendants agreed to pay plaintiff a commission of $2,500, which was unpaid; the third, for the reasonable value of pipe and tubing sold to defendants. The court found plaintiff had been paid in full, and he appeals from the judgment and from an order…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Kruckow v. LesserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Dankert v. Lamb Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Marson v. RandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Fuschi v. Vir DenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Murphy v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. People v. MotenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Lubeck v. LopesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Capaldi v. LevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API