Legal Opinion

Holt State Bank v. Hamernes

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 20, 1927No. 26,110PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

The plaintiff appeals from an order denying application for the appointment of a receiver of the property of the defendant Hamernes.

On November 17, 1921, the defendant gave the plaintiff bank a mortgage for $2,500, due July 1, 1922. It was foreclosed under the power of sale and the mortgaged property was purchased by the bank at the foreclosure sale on November 13, 1926, for $2,000, a sum more than $1,000 less than was due on the mortgage. There were delinquent taxes to the amount of $575 which were a paramount lien at the time of the foreclosure sale. The amount is the same now. The property…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. CadySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  2. Peterson v. HeringtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gardner v. W. M. Prindle & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. Windom National Bank v. RenoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Business Women's Holding Co. v. Farmers & Mechanics Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  5. Grady v. First State Security Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API