Legal Opinion

Gardner v. W. M. Prindle & Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 8, 1932No. 28,570PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStonb, J.

From a judgment for defendant ordered on the pleadings plaintiff appeals.

In 1925 Zachary T. Mullin (since deceased and of whose estate plaintiff is now administrator de bonis non) to secure a f35,000 loan, mortgaged to defendant certain Duluth real estate, the mortgage being in the form of a trust deed. It contained an assignment to the mortgagee of the rents and profits to pay taxes, assessments, and insurance premiums in the payment of which the mortgagor might default. By apt words it was attempted to make that assignment available to the mortgagee after foreclosure and during the year for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Winne v. LahartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  2. Lowell v. DoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. CadySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  4. Cullen v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  5. Moncrieff v. HareSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. ZacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. G.G.C. Co. v. First National Bank of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Cross Companies v. Citizens Mortgage Investment TrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. In re StacyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1934
  5. Oles v. PlummerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API