Legal Opinion
State v. Granchay
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 31, 1964No. Nos. 4379, 4380, 4381, 4382, 4383, 4384, 4387, 4388, 4390, 4391, 4392, 4393, 4394, 4398, 4399, 4405, 4406, 4407, 4408, 4409, 4410, 4411, 4412, 4413, 4414, 4423, 4424, 4425, 4426, 4427, 4428, 4429, 4430 and 4431PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrance, J.
The basic issues raised in each of these thirty-four cases are the same. Each appellant was subpoened to appear before the Mahoning County September Grand Jury; each appeared and, after answering certain preliminary questions, refused to answer others on the ground that his answer “may tend to incriminate me under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution of Ohio.” In each case the prosecuting attorney caused the Court of Common Pleas (Rigelhaupt, J.) to be informed of the interrogatories, the refusal and the excuse…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Loubriel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- In Re KurtzhalzOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- In Re Martin, Jr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
- Ex Parte RoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- In Re FryeOhio Supreme Court · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State of Ohio v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- In Re YohoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re Miami County Grand Jury Directive to CreagerOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. PratoOhio Court of Appeals · 1965
- In re KohnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.