Legal Opinion
Loubriel v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 4, 1926No. 240PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAND, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).
The order dismissing the writ of habeas corpus must be affirmed. We understand the ease of Craig v. Hecht, 263 U. S. 255, 44 S. Ct. 103, 68 L. Ed. 293, to have established that the writ does not lie to review an order adjudging the relator in contempt of court. Cases like Ex parte Hudgings, 249 U. S. 378, 39 S. Ct. 337, 63 L. Ed. 656, 11 A. L. R. 333, are confessedly exceptional in their character. We read the last declaration of the Supreme Court as indicating a disposition substantially, if not altogether, to eliminate the exception,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Ex Parte HudgingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Craig v. HechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- People v. GilletteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- O'CONNELL v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- United States v. First National City BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- State v. DeColaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.