Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Miami County Grand Jury Directive to Creager

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 1992No. 91-CA-50PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fain, Presiding Judge.

Appellant Robert L. Creager has appealed from an order of the Miami County Common Pleas Court holding him in direct contempt for failure to comply with a directive of the Miami County Grand Jury requesting a handwriting exemplar, and ordering him incarcerated until such time as he shall provide a handwriting exemplar. Creager has averred indigency and has moved for the appointment of counsel to represent him in connection with his appeal.

This court appointed counsel to represent Creager for the limited purpose of briefing the issue of whether Creager was entitled to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Contemnor Caron, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division2000
  2. City of Garfield Heights v. StefaniukOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. In Re Grand Jury Directive to CreagerOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API