Legal Opinion

In Re Frye

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1951No. 32258PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The general rule is that a witness, especially when not a party to the controversy, may be required to testify upon any subject concerning which judicial inquiry is made and upon which he possesses specific personal information. To this general rule, there are certain well recognized exceptions. A witness may always claim as privileged that which tends to incriminate him. Article V, Amendments, U. S. Constitution, and Section 10, Article I, Constitution of Ohio.

Also, under Section 11494, General Code, a witness who stands in either of several relationships named in the statute shall not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weis v. WeisOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  2. In Re Martin, Jr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. In Re HydeOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  4. In Re KeoughOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Ex Parte BevanOhio Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. Arnold (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Wagenheim v. Alexander Grant & Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. State ex rel. Boswell v. CurtisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Springfield Local School District Board of Education v. Ohio Ass'n of Public School Employees, Local 530Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API