Legal Opinion

Rake v. City of Tulsa

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 23, 1962No. 39863PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Vice Chief Justice.

This appeal concerns the matter of whether or not a city is liable for the tort of one of its employees. Plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, was a passenger in an automobile when it collided, at a Tulsa city intersection, with a panel truck belonging to said City’s Fire Department, and driven by one Jackie Dean Martin, one of said Department’s employees, while in the course of performing one of the duties of his position, viz., going from one of said City’s fire stations, to another, inspecting and checking each’s radio equipment to see that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Hargrove v. Town of Cocoa BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  3. Oklahoma City v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Ford v. City of CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Oklahoma City v. HaggardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Daytona Beach v. PalmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Shockey v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. Lane v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. Kish v. City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Andrade v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API