Legal Opinion

Shockey v. City of Oklahoma City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 28, 1981No. 54423PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Chief Justice:

The issue presented is whether the Oklahoma Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act, 51 O.S.Supp.1978, § 151 et seq., (specifically § 155(6) 1 ) bars a tort action against a municipality for fire damages sustained which allegedly resulted from an inoperable fire hydrant? We answer in the affirmative.

Appellants, after exhausting the statutory claims filing procedure pursuant to the above act, commenced proceedings in the district court, alleging, inter alia, that: a fire occurred at their home and due to the absence of water from the fire hydrant serving their area, fire…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lane v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. City of Oklahoma City v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  3. Rake v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jackson v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  2. Salazar v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. Wells v. City of LynchburgCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  4. FARLEY v. CITY OF CLAREMORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  5. Brenda Albert v. City of WheelingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API