Oklahoma City v. Foster
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUTH, C.
The parties hereto will be referred to as they appeared in tlie trial court.'
The allegations of the petition and the un-controverted evidence is substantially as follows: On December 12, 1921, and prior thereto, plaintiff was a police officer on the “plain clothes” squad, and had been detailed on “scout duty” by the chief of police of Oklahoma City. That is, he was directed' to ride in the side car of a motorcycle operated by Wilkes, another police officer of the defendant city, and their duties were to ride around or “scout” about the city to prevent crime, and to watch for…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Chicago v. KeefeIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
- City of Shawnee v. RoushSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- City of Denver v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Bowden v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Leader Printing Co. v. LowrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- City of Houston v. ShillingTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Niblock v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1941
- Thomas v. HilburnMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
- Bucholz v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
- Ex Parte HoustonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.