Legal Opinion

United States v. Aguila-Montes De Oca

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 11, 2011No. 05-50170PublishedCited by 154 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM Opinion; Opinion by Judge BYBEE; Concurrence by Judge BERZON; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge RAWLINSON.

OPINION

2Per curiam

A majority of the en banc court (Judge Bybee, joined by Judges Rymer, Silver-man, Gould, Rawlinson and Callahan) overrules our prior holding in Navarro-Lopez v. Gonzales, 503 F.3d 1063, 1073 (9th Cir. 2007) (en banc), that the modified categori*917cal approach doesn’t apply “[w]hen the crime of conviction is missing an element of the generic crime altogether.”

A different majority (Judge Bybee, joined by Chief Judge Kozinski and Judges Rymer, W. Fletcher,…

3Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Begay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by154 opinions

  1. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Carlos Rendon v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Irma Ovalles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. Timothy Wolf ChildCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Mirna GomezCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012

149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API