Legal Opinion

People v. Vincenty

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1986PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

The Trial Judge distributed portions of his preliminary instructions to the jury in writing, which included a written outline of the elements of robbery in the first degree. Defendant’s objection to this procedure was preserved for this court’s review as it was sufficiently specific (see, People v Vidal, 26 NY2d 249, 254; People v West, 56 NY2d 662, 663). This procedure violated defendant’s right to a fair trial, and the error cannot be considered harmless (see, People v Townsend, 67…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. VidalNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. People v. TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. OwensNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. People v. HarperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. People v. JoyNew York Supreme Court · 1986
  5. People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API