Legal Opinion

People v. Owens

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1987PublishedCited by 126 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Kaye, J.

Where defense counsel objects, it is improper for a trial *588court, after reciting its instructions orally, to distribute only certain portions of that charge in writing to the jury for use in its deliberations. In. each case before us, where excerpts from the charge were handed out to the jury over defendant’s objection, the conviction must be reversed and a new trial ordered.

People v Owens

Following an incident in which an undercover officer allegedly purchased cocaine from him, defendant James Owens was tried for the criminal possession and sale of a controlled…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. MehmediNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. CulhaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. People v. PiazzaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. People v. . OdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by126 opinions

  1. People v. DamianoNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. People v. BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. People v. NimmonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. People v. DeGinaNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. People v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1988

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API