People v. Vidal
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBreitel, J.
On this appeal by defendant from a conviction for grand larceny in the first degree, he raises three alleged trial errors during his cross-examination.
Defendant was tried in 1961 for automobile larceny in 1960. He was not sentenced until 1966 because in the interim he had been a fugitive.
Defendant, who had testified that he had never been in the stolen car, was cross-examined, without objection, about" a prior *251conviction, arising out of the theft, for driving the stolen automobile without a license. He was also questioned, over general objections, about acts of prior misconduct, one the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Turner v. . City of NewburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Bergmann v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Ward v. . KilpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- People v. LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Fountain v. . PetteeNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- People v. ElyNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. De JesusNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. PaganNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- United States v. Bryan Canniff and John BenignoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.