Legal Opinion

People v. Vidal

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1970PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBreitel, J.

On this appeal by defendant from a conviction for grand larceny in the first degree, he raises three alleged trial errors during his cross-examination.

Defendant was tried in 1961 for automobile larceny in 1960. He was not sentenced until 1966 because in the interim he had been a fugitive.

Defendant, who had testified that he had never been in the stolen car, was cross-examined, without objection, about" a prior *251conviction, arising out of the theft, for driving the stolen automobile without a license. He was also questioned, over general objections, about acts of prior misconduct, one the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Turner v. . City of NewburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Bergmann v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Ward v. . KilpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. People v. LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. Fountain v. . PetteeNew York Court of Appeals · 1868

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. People v. ElyNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. De JesusNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. People v. WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. PaganNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. United States v. Bryan Canniff and John BenignoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API