Legal Opinion
Cox Communications PCS, L.P. v. City of San Marcos
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 18, 2002No. Civ. 01CV2304-B (AJB)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
BREWSTER, Senior District Judge.
I. Introduction and Background
Plaintiff Cox Communications PCS, L.P., (d.b.a. Sprint PCS), (“Sprint”) is a provider of wireless telecommunications service throughout the San Diego area, including the City of San Marcos (“City”). On April 20, 2001, Sprint requested the right to use the City’s public rights-of-way to install various facilities at three sites in the City. The facilities include wireless cell devices that attach to electrical poles and boxes at the base of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Cellular Telephone Company, Doing Business as at & T Wireless Services v. The Town of Oyster Bay and the Town Board of the Town of Oyster BayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Rent-A-Center, Inc. v. Canyon Television & Appliance Rental, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- City of Auburn v. Qwest Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees International Union v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Daghlian v. DeVry University, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
- Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. v. County of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2005
- Sprint Telephony Pcs, L.P. v. County Of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- NextG Networks of California, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.