Legal Opinion
Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. v. County of San Diego
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 8, 2005No. 03CV1398 BTM(BLM)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART SPRINT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART COUNTY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND (3) ORDERING ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT
MOSKOWITZ, District Judge.
On December 1, 2004, Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. (“Sprint”) filed a motion for partial summary judgment. On December 17, 2004, defendants County of San Diego, Greg Cox, Dianne Jacob, Pam Slater, Ron Roberts and Bill Horn (collectively “County”) filed a motion for summary judgment, or, in the alternative, partial…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blessing v. FreestoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Walnut CreekDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
- Sprint Telephony Pcs, L.P. v. County Of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Verizon Wireless (VAW) v. City of Rio Rancho, NMDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2007
- Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.