Legal Opinion
City of Auburn v. Qwest Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 10, 2001No. 99-36173, 99-36219PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Opinion filed April 24, 2001 [247 F.3d 966] is amended as follows:
1. At 247 F.3d at 980, section II.C.l, second paragraph: Replace sentence reading: “A number of courts have held that various requirements imposed by local ordinances constitute a prohibition within the meaning of § 253(a).” with “A number of courts have held that certain requirements imposed by local ordinances constitute a prohibition within the meaning of § 253(a).”
2. At 247 F.3d at 981, section II.C.l, third paragraph: Replace sentence read*1165ing: “The ordinances at issue in the present case include several features…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Nano Maldonado v. Tony Harris, in His Capacity as Acting Director of the California Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Qwest Corporation v. City of Santa FeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- New Jersey Payphone Association, Inc, a Not for Profit Corporation Organized Under the Laws of New Jersey v. Town of West New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Immigrant Assistance Project Of The Los Angeles County Federation Of Labor v. Immigration And Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.