Legal Opinion

Judd v. Bowen

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 30, 2017No. 20140285-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROTH, Judge:

¶1 David Bowen appeals from a judgment granting a prescriptive easement to Robert L. Judd III and Charles L. Allen to use and park on his driveway. We affirm in part and reverse in part and remand the case for further proceedings.

BACKGROUND

¶2 This appeal centers on a century-old circular driveway (the Driveway) between two cabins in Big Cottonwood Canyon. The cabin on the southeast of the Driveway belongs to the Bowens,2 and the Driveway is located almost entirely on their property. The cabin to the northeast of the Driveway belongs to the Judds, who claim a legal right…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. NielsenUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Co. v. MoyleUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Orton v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Whitesides v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1896

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bosin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
  2. Judd v. BowenUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  3. SRB Investment v. SpencerUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Harrison v. Spah Family LTDUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Bridge Bloq Nac LLC v. SorfCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API