Judd v. Bowen
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Justice Durrant, opinion of the Court:
Introduction
¶1 After decades of amicable use of a circular driveway touching adjacent cabins, two families now dispute whether an easement by prescription exists. The Judd family maintains that it has a prescriptive easement to the entire driveway for access and parking purposes. The Bowen family argues that any use of the driveway by the Judds came *1034 through the Bowens' permission and so no prescriptive right exists. After a four-day bench trial, the trial court granted the Judds a prescriptive easement for both access and parking purposes. On…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hendricks County Rural Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Orton v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Coulter & Smith, Ltd. v. RussellUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Crane v. CraneUtah Supreme Court · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- SRB Investment v. SpencerUtah Supreme Court · 2020
- Harrison v. Spah Family LTDUtah Supreme Court · 2020
- Allen Family Trust v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- Bridge Bloq Nac LLC v. SorfCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- C-B-K Ranch v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.