Legal Opinion

Judd v. Bowen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2018No. Case No. 20170431PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice Durrant, opinion of the Court:

Introduction

¶1 After decades of amicable use of a circular driveway touching adjacent cabins, two families now dispute whether an easement by prescription exists. The Judd family maintains that it has a prescriptive easement to the entire driveway for access and parking purposes. The Bowen family argues that any use of the driveway by the Judds came *1034 through the Bowens' permission and so no prescriptive right exists. After a four-day bench trial, the trial court granted the Judds a prescriptive easement for both access and parking purposes. On…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Hendricks County Rural Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Orton v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Coulter & Smith, Ltd. v. RussellUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Crane v. CraneUtah Supreme Court · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. SRB Investment v. SpencerUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Harrison v. Spah Family LTDUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Allen Family Trust v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  4. Bridge Bloq Nac LLC v. SorfCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  5. C-B-K Ranch v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API