Legal Opinion

State v. Ham

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided January 11, 1996No. 950062-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIS, Associate Presiding Judge:

Defendant Gordon Ray Ham appeals his conviction of possession of a controlled substance with the intent to distribute, a second degree felony, in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 58 — 37—8(1)(a)(iv) (Supp.1995). We reverse.

I. FACTS

On the day in question, defendant was on probation because of a felony conviction related to sexual misconduct. As a condition of his probation, defendant signed a probation agreement which contained the following “Conditions of Probation”:

2. I shall permit visits to my place of residence ... as required by the Department of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. BisnerUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. TrippUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  5. State v. BeachCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API